Subject	Sweet! (n/m)
Posted by	timz on September 09, 2002 at 3:06 PM
	This message has been viewed 32 times.
In Reply To	Dyno #'s today, timing tweak..... posted by colocomp on September 09, 2002 at 03:00 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Dyno #'s today, timing tweak..... - colocomp 15:00:33 09/09/02 Sweet! (n/m) - timz 15:06:41 09/09/02 Your numbers were nice to from this last weekend, congrats (n/m) - colocomp 15:10:16 09/09/02 not bad at all! (n/m) - z rider 15:07:10 09/09/02 Nice! (n/m) - Spongerider (Soon) 15:13:20 09/09/02 You really feel those 15hp, I know I did (n/m) - Miles (San Antonio, TX) 15:24:44 09/09/02 17 PSI on stock IC and no problems? (n/m) - JULIAN911 15:25:03 09/09/02 Can't be done in Texas that's for sure! (n/m) - Miles (San Antonio, TX) 15:34:59 09/09/02 yes it can (n/m) - genic 15:42:27 09/09/02 I would be nervous? why not you genic? (n/m) - Miles (San Antonio, TX) 15:45:04 09/09/02 becuase genic is a smart man. (n/m) - SactoTodd 15:56:09 09/09/02 Well, obviously your not with your level of spelling errors (n/m) - Miles (San Antonio, TX) 15:59:38 09/09/02 lol, difference between a typo and just being dumb. - SactoTodd 16:05:37 09/09/02 you're (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 16:07:12 09/09/02 Give me a break guys. I sliced my hand=monkey finger (n/m) - Miles (San Antonio, TX) 16:15:11 09/09/02 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ - U ZCREAM (Gainesville) 16:17:26 09/09/02 I guess it would be a stretch to actually answer a question. (n/m) - Brad (JSpecZ32) 18:50:33 09/09/02 17psi in tejas is not bad - genic 19:44:38 09/09/02 Were a mile high, air not as dense, we run richer. (n/m) - colocomp 15:37:44 09/09/02 that is a myth - aliaZ 15:56:02 09/09/02 nice numbers BTW (n/m) - aliaZ 15:56:36 09/09/02 I believe we do, I would bet a couple of dollars that my.... - colocomp 16:27:39 09/09/02 Hmm, but I didn't have a JWT ecu and I run rich. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 17:15:52 09/09/02 But why? - aliaZ 19:37:21 09/09/02 you run richer? - Marshall 16:09:42 09/09/02 A/F on the dyno sheet, yes 17 PSI, No Detonation (n/m) - colocomp 16:19:32 09/09/02 The MAF corrects for density/ altitude (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 17:44:45 09/09/02 Not totally. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 07:22:35 09/10/02 it should, that's its function - Marshall 11:30:16 09/10/02 Should and Does are 2 different things. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 12:04:21 09/10/02 That is true. (n/m) - Marshall 12:29:07 09/10/02 That is a nice number Wayne. Congrats! Kinda lets...>> - 5150Z 15:48:07 09/09/02 Thanks G, test & tune Wen eve @ Bandimere if you can make it (n/m) - colocomp 15:52:56 09/09/02 do you still have main cats or are they gutted? (n/m) - MyWhiteZTT(NJ) 15:51:25 09/09/02 Still have them (n/m) - colocomp 15:54:21 09/09/02 What was the correction factor? Those are good numbers - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 17:38:05 09/09/02 Not sure about correction factor. - colocomp 17:53:40 09/09/02 Looks like 21% -23% CF is the average on their website. - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 18:48:11 09/09/02 I don't believe that, I've seen other Z's Dyno... - colocomp 19:12:17 09/09/02 I'm sorry but a Stock WS6 does not dyno 340rwhp - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 19:38:24 09/09/02 Every car I've seen run on that DynoJet numbers have - colocomp 19:54:24 09/09/02 do the algebra with the CF and you will see your actual - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 21:06:50 09/09/02 Apply the same algebra to Tims and Chris Z with the CF and.. - colocomp 07:28:13 09/10/02 Brand new WS6 dynoed 318 in PA few months ago. (n/m) - Yuengling 20:07:30 09/09/02 Thanks, I wan't good comparisions. - colocomp 20:15:12 09/09/02 Hahaha, and they're officially rated at 325 at the crank - Marshall 21:33:40 09/09/02 Yeah HAhaha aply the correction factor and He's only making - colocomp 08:31:40 09/10/02 Ummm, that's at sea level dude. - Marshall 11:27:21 09/10/02 I'm Talking about the Denver WS6. - colocomp 12:07:57 09/10/02 You sound like you don't even know what a CF is. - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 11:46:01 09/11/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.